Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS)
From food additives, perfume ingredients, fabrics, paints, petrol, detergents and fire retardants.
Everyday people in the industrialised world come in contact with many chemicals. These may be in foods, such as artificial flavourings, colourings or preservatives, or various items used in perfumes, fabrics, paints, petrol, detergents, fire retardants in furniture and so on. In liquid form, these are known as hydrocarbons. Their emissions are known as volatile organic compounds which suggests an ability to change and become unstable depending on conditions of temperature or humidity. Fertilisers and pesticides, which are used to promote growth and protect food from contamination, have similar properties. All originate from chemicals known as organophosphates. Occasional exposure to these chemicals is unlikely to cause major symptoms of toxicity e.g. breathing problems, lethargy, generalised muscle aching, confusion or collapse but could do if the exposure is heavy and prolonged. However, a few individuals with low tolerance can develop the same symptoms if they come in contact with sub-toxic levels of these chemicals. This phenomenon is described as Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MSC).
How Does MCS Happen?
It is unusual to see in our clinics a person with MCS who does not have a history of allergy to natural inhalants such as dust mites, pollens, animals or moulds or long-standing food intolerance, see the section on Food Intolerance. Therefore, MCS is an alarming development in a long chain of events which previously overloaded one's immune system. It is important to emphasise that most conditions caused by these allergenic factors do not usually receive cause-oriented medical care and doctors, in an attempt to alleviate the problem, resort to a suppression of the symptom without realising the complex immune mechanisms in operation.
Predisposing Factors and Mechanisms
Frequent contact with chemical agents is likely to sensitise a person. Example: contact dermatitis can start affecting a person's hands after years of safely using washing up liquid; clerical staff can become unwell when close to photocopiers; ordinary people can become hypersensitive to other people's perfumes, hair sprays, deodorants or smoking; drivers, previously oblivious to any symptoms from traffic fumes, can become sensitive to petrol and exhaust fumes. It is possible that people with chemical sensitivity have a genetic predisposition affecting important detoxification processes in the cell. The human nose is capable of recognising a scent in the air in concentrations as little as 1:500,000,000 parts. Patients and their families often think of chemical sensitivity as a life-threatening allergy because of the severity and the speed of the symptoms they experience. However, when tested for markers of immediate allergy to these chemicals, this is not confirmed. Different mechanisms are in operation here, such as T-lymphocytes, cellular hormones and immunoglobulin-G all of which are capable of causing serious symptoms, mimicking allergy.
Effects and Symptoms
Chemical sensitivity is not a mere dislike of a smell or a chemical in the air, it is the fact that a person feels unwell or ill, suffers from sudden debilitating weakness, lethargy, nasal congestion, headache, muscle aches, confusion, brain fog, nausea, perspiration, acute anxiety, panic attacks or acute depression and sometimes collapse. In MCS the physical suffering is sometimes interwoven with a strong psychological component: in an attempt to minimise contact with other people's perfumes and environmental pollutants some patients are forced to live in a reclusive environment and socialising becomes problematic. From a psychiatric angle, these syndromes are akin to some psychiatric diagnoses such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, acute anxiety states or phobias and even schizophrenia. Whilst it is important to identify and address the underlying cause(s), it is sometimes difficult to ignore the strong psychological component which exists and might hinder effective help with this condition.
Sick Building Syndrome
Several years ago, a number of clerical staff whose firms started operating from new premises, became unwell complaining of a variety of vague symptoms; they felt better when they went on leave or during the weekends. After the initial scepticism, it became obvious that their symptoms were the result of chemical emissions from new carpets, wall paints and plastics, to which some employees reacted more seriously than others, combined with poor ventilation. The same workers experienced no symptoms when they were asked to work on different premises. A similar situation occurred in recent years when some passengers and aircrew on long-haul flights became nauseous and suffered breathing difficulties from the effects of legal levels of aviation fuel emissions in the passenger cabin. Chemical sensitivity may be affected by constant contact with high electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) generated by modern electrical appliances, laptops, wi-fi, mobile telephones and so on.
Treatment for Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
Chemical sensitivity can be confirmed with a placebo-controlled challenge. In a clean, thoroughly purified setting the administration of sublingual drops for a number of chemicals causes transient symptoms, whereas water or normal saline solution does not. The diagnosis of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity relies on one's detailed history and specific tests. Lymphocyte sensitivity to most chemicals including mercury, nickel, and silver, all present in dental fillings and fat cell biopsies are also useful investigations in assessing the extent and severity of the problem. When one cannot avoid any of these factors it is possible to improve tolerance using a safe and specific method of desensitisation.
Listen to this Radio 4 Programme Allergic to the 21st Century which was broadcast on the 31st March 2015.
A patient's own experience overcoming MCS
Approximately 4 years ago, I referred myself to Dr Econs for enzyme-potentiated desensitisation (EPD). This was somewhat of a last resort for me having been referred to multiple medical specialists and having tried a range of complementary therapies for progressively worsening chronic fatigue and numerous food and chemical sensitivities that had been ongoing for some 5 years previously. At the time of my referral, my diet had become limited to chicken and a few vegetables. I had been unable to work for two years, was underweight and only able to stay out of bed for a few hours at a time. Exposure to cleaning products and perfumes led to nosebleeds. Whilst sceptical about the efficacy of EPD, the physiological basis of the treatment made sense to me. My treatment began with EPD injections approximately every 3 months and over time the period between treatments has been lengthened so that I now receive treatment roughly every 7 months. I have also followed a rotation diet. The results were not immediate; in fact, I think it took about a year for me to begin to see a real difference but since then I have gone from strength to strength. Treatment has given me the vitality I needed to live again. I have returned to full-time employment and I have been able to pursue my career ambitions that I had previously given up hope of. I have also been able to broaden my diet and I now enjoy eating a wide range of foods. Whilst it could be suggested that the changes represent natural healing with time, I think that the gradual worsening of symptoms in the 5 years prior to starting treatment would suggest that this would have been the natural trajectory of my illness. LD (2017)
Contact us if you have further questions or to make an appointment for a consultation.